Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Insolvency and Bankruptcy Insolvency and Bankruptcy + AT Insolvency and Bankruptcy - 2022 (5) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2022 (5) TMI 1618 - AT - Insolvency and Bankruptcy


Issues:
1. Appeal against the order passed by the Adjudicating Authority under Section 7.
2. Admission of the Application under Section 7.
3. Settlement between the parties leading to withdrawal of the Appeal and Section 7 Application.

Analysis:
1. The Appeal was filed against the order dated 25.03.2022 by the Adjudicating Authority under Section 7 filed by 'ICICI Prudential Venture Capital Fund Real Estate Scheme-I'. The Appeal was heard, and it was noted that a Reply by the Appellant was filed on 24th March, 2022. However, due to a misunderstanding regarding the filing of the Reply, the Court proceeded to admit the Application under Section 7. The Committee of Creditors (CoC) had not been constituted at that time. The Respondent accepted the notice, and the Respondent was directed to file a Reply-Affidavit within two weeks. The Appeal was listed for further proceedings on 11th May, 2022. In the meantime, the CoC was directed not to be constituted as per the impugned order.

2. Subsequently, an Application I.A. No. 1346 of 2022 was filed by the parties, presenting a Settlement dated 21.04.2022. The Settlement involved the withdrawal of both the Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 400 of 2022 and the Application under Section 7 filed by the Financial Creditor. The Tribunal allowed the said application, recorded the Settlement, and permitted the Appellant to withdraw the Company Appeal to facilitate the parties to approach the Adjudicating Authority for the withdrawal of the Section 7 Application. The parties were given the liberty to request the Adjudicating Authority for necessary orders concerning expenses.

3. Consequently, the Appeal was allowed to be withdrawn, but no further steps were to be taken based on the impugned order for two weeks. The Tribunal highlighted that this decision was made in the specific circumstances of the case and due to the Settlement between the parties, emphasizing that it should not be considered a precedent for future cases.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates