Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2007 (10) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2007 (10) TMI 94 - AT - Central Excise


Issues: Eligibility of capital goods credit under Rule 57Q for testing equipment used in the manufacture of refrigerators and compressors.

Analysis:
1. Issue of Disallowance of Modvat Credit: The original authority disallowed Modvat credit of duty on the testing equipment received by the company, stating it was not eligible under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The invoice described the equipment as a system consisting of various testing apparatus. The Commissioner (Appeals) examined the admissibility of capital goods credit and found the equipment to be capital goods required for manufacturing refrigerating appliances. The relevant clause under Rule 57Q excluded goods used for refrigerating and air conditioning appliances and machinery.

2. Interpretation of Rule 57Q: The company argued that the restriction on credit applied only to goods under Heading 90.32 and not to goods under Heading 90.31, to which the testing equipment belonged. They contended that the grouping of entries in the rule indicated the restriction was specific to goods under Heading 90.32. The Appellate Tribunal analyzed the language of the rule and determined that the restriction indeed applied only to goods under Heading 90.32, not to those under Heading 90.31.

3. Decision and Ruling: The Appellate Tribunal concluded that the testing equipment fell under Chapter Sub Heading 90.31, which was eligible for capital goods credit at the relevant time. Therefore, the equipment was deemed eligible for capital goods credit under Rule 57Q. The appeal filed by the company was allowed, overturning the impugned order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals). The Tribunal ordered in favor of the company, allowing the capital goods credit for the testing equipment used in the manufacturing process of refrigerators and compressors.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates