Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2022 (8) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2022 (8) TMI 1517 - AT - Income Tax


Issues involved: Appeal against order dated 31.06.2019 of Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-4, New Delhi for assessment year 2015-16 regarding disallowance of payment made to an Overseas Entity without withholding tax under Section 195 of the Act.

Summary:
The assessee, a resident corporate entity engaged in providing business process outsourcing services to overseas Associated Enterprises, filed its return of income for the year under dispute. The assessing officer disallowed a payment made to an Overseas Entity, IQOR Philippines, as business auxiliary services without withholding tax under Section 195 of the Act. The assessee argued that the payment should be treated as business profit due to the absence of a Fee for Technical Services (FTS) clause in the India-Philippines Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA). The assessing officer disagreed, considering the payment as FTS and applied domestic law provisions. The Commissioner (Appeals) held that the income should be classified as business profit under Article 7 of the DTAA, and in the absence of a Permanent Establishment (PE), the income is not taxable in India.

Upon hearing both parties and examining the material, the Tribunal found in favor of the assessee based on previous decisions related to the India-Philippines DTAA. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, citing similar rulings in other cases. No contrary decision was presented, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

In conclusion, the appeal against the disallowance of payment made to an Overseas Entity without withholding tax under Section 195 of the Act was dismissed by the Tribunal based on the interpretation of the India-Philippines DTAA and the absence of a PE in India for the payee.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates