9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2016 (6) TMI 93 - AT - Income TaxDisallowance made u/s.43B - amount of excise duty paid - Held that - CIT(A) while deciding the issue in favour of assessee has given a finding that the amount of excise duty paid by the assessee was eligible for deduction in view of the decisions cited in his order. We also find that A.O. in his order has noted that the facts in the impugned year A.Y. 2009-10 are similar to that of A.Y. 2008-09. We further find that the Co-ordinate Bench in assessee s own case for A.Y. 2008-09, while deciding the appeal of Revenue has decided the issue in favour of assessee by holding that the Section 43B is not restrictive of prohibiting section by the Revenue but it is equally an enabling provision under which deductions are allowed on the payment of duties and taxes. In other words, the provision of Section 43B overrides the method of accounting consistently followed and provides for the deduction of statutory liabilities in the year of payment irrespective of the year in which the liability is incurred. - Decided against revenue
Issues: Disallowance of excise duty under section 43B of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2009-10.
Issue 1: Disallowance of excise duty under section 43B of the Income Tax Act The appeal filed by the Revenue challenged the order of the CIT(A)-VI, Baroda, regarding the disallowance of excise duty of ?4,04,19,672 under section 43B of the Act for the assessment year 2009-10. The Assessing Officer (A.O.) disallowed the deduction as the excise duty liability was not considered to have accrued during the year, and the payment was shown as recoverable in the Balance Sheet. The A.O. emphasized that under the mercantile system of accounting, the deduction under section 43B is allowable in the year of payment only if the liability accrued during the previous year. The CIT(A) deleted the addition, stating that excise duty liability accrued when the demand was raised by the concerned officer, irrespective of the appellant's dispute over the liability. The CIT(A) relied on legal precedents to support the decision, emphasizing that the treatment in the books of account is not relevant for the deduction under the IT Act. The Revenue, aggrieved by the CIT(A)'s order, appealed before the ITAT. Issue 2: Judicial Precedents and Interpretation of Section 43B The ITAT analyzed the facts and legal arguments presented by both parties. The ITAT noted that the A.O. admitted the similarity between the facts of the current year and the previous assessment year 2008-09. Referring to a Co-ordinate Bench decision in the appellant's case for A.Y. 2008-09, the ITAT highlighted that the demand raised by the Excise Department was discharged through a refund adjustment, making the appellant eligible for the deduction under section 43B. The ITAT emphasized the importance of the demand notices issued by the excise department in determining the accrual of liability, as established in legal precedents. The ITAT also cited relevant case laws to support the deduction of statutory liabilities in the year of payment, irrespective of the accounting method followed. The ITAT concluded that since the Revenue failed to provide any contrary binding decision, and considering the precedent set in the appellant's case for A.Y. 2008-09, there was no justification to overturn the CIT(A)'s order. Consequently, the ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the decision to delete the disallowance of excise duty under section 43B for the assessment year 2009-10. This judgment by the ITAT Ahmedabad centered on the disallowance of excise duty under section 43B of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2009-10. The ITAT meticulously analyzed the legal arguments, judicial precedents, and factual circumstances to uphold the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the disallowance. The ITAT underscored the significance of demand notices in determining the accrual of liability and emphasized the applicability of legal principles supporting the deduction of statutory liabilities in the year of payment. The judgment provides a comprehensive interpretation of the law and highlights the importance of consistent application of legal principles in tax matters.
|
