2016 (11) TMI 1213 - AT - Central Excise

Imposition of penalty - genuineness of transaction - Held that - the submissions made by the appellant that the duty paid documents issued to the buyer of the goods M/s Disco Pithampur is genuine and the goods were sold on cash transaction through bank accounts, should be acceptable as the evidence, since no contradiction has been made either in the adjudication order or in the impugned order. In view of above, I set aside the impugned order - appeal allowed - decided in favor of appellant.

Summary

Issues:
Imposition of penalty without considering submissions on genuineness of transactions.

Analysis:
The appellant challenged the imposition of penalty, claiming that their submissions regarding the genuineness of transactions were not considered by the authorities below. The Tribunal noted that while the reply filed by the appellant was considered in the adjudication order, no findings were recorded on the submissions made by the appellant. The relevant reply stated that the goods were sold on a cash transaction basis through bank transfers and that the documents with the buyer were genuine. The Tribunal observed that the submissions of the appellant were not taken into consideration while imposing the penalty. Consequently, the Tribunal found that since there was no contradiction in the orders, the submissions should be accepted as evidence. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant.