Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2016 (12) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2016 (12) TMI 318 - AT - Customs


Issues: Classification of imported products under CTH 250820 or CTH 380290, Mis-description, Time-barred demand, Principles of natural justice violation

In this case, the main issue revolves around the classification of products imported by the respondent, specifically Bleaching Earth V2 Super Galleon. The respondent initially sought classification under CTH 250820, but a subsequent show-cause notice alleged mis-description and wrong classification under CTH 380290. The adjudicating authority reclassified the product to CTH 3802.90, leading to duty demands, interest, and penalties. The first appellate authority set aside the order-in-original, stating there was no mis-declaration and the demands raised were incorrect, emphasizing that the goods were correctly classified under CTH 2508. The authority also highlighted the absence of evidence supporting re-classification under CTH 3802, thus deeming the demand time-barred. Additionally, the authority noted a violation of principles of natural justice due to the lack of essential documents provided to the appellant during the proceedings.

The appellate tribunal, after reviewing the case, found that the reasoning of the first appellate authority was sound. It emphasized that re-classification without substantial evidence was unwarranted, especially considering the lack of analysis or testing to support the classification under CTH 3802. The tribunal noted that the appellant's description of the product as Bleaching Earth V2 Super Galleon fell under CTH 250820, which covers Decolourising earth and Fuller's earth. It further pointed out that Chapter Heading 382090, which covers Activated Natural Mineral Products, did not have sufficient evidence to support reclassification. Therefore, the tribunal upheld the impugned order, rejecting the appeal and emphasizing the correctness of the initial classification under CTH 2508.

In conclusion, the tribunal upheld the decision, emphasizing the importance of providing substantial evidence for reclassification and adhering to principles of natural justice during proceedings. The case highlights the significance of accurate classification of imported products and the necessity of following due process in customs disputes.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates