Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + HC Companies Law - 2017 (2) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2017 (2) TMI 128 - HC - Companies Law


Issues:
Petition filed under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 seeking sanction for the proposed scheme of Amalgamation.

Analysis:
The joint petition was filed by multiple Transferor Companies and a Transferee Company seeking sanction for the proposed scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The Transferor Companies were incorporated on different dates under the Act, with the Transferee Company being incorporated separately. The proposed scheme aimed at amalgamating the activities of the Transferor Companies with the Transferee Company for mutual benefit. The share exchange ratio was detailed in the proposed scheme, and it was mentioned that no proceedings under Sections 235 to 251 of the Act were pending against the Petitioner Companies. The Board of Directors of all Petitioner Companies unanimously approved the proposed scheme in separate meetings. A previous application seeking directions to dispense with shareholder and creditor meetings was allowed by the Court. The Official Liquidator and the Regional Director did not raise any objections to the proposed scheme. No objections were received from any other party, and compliance with publication requirements was confirmed. Based on approvals and reports, the Court granted sanction to the proposed scheme, with the Transferor Companies set to dissolve post-sanction without winding up. A certified copy of the order was to be filed with the Registrar of Companies, and any deficiencies or violations would not impede legal action. The order did not exempt from statutory obligations, and costs were to be deposited with the Bar Association's fund. The petition was allowed and disposed of accordingly.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates