9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2009 (7) TMI 58 - AAR - Income TaxMarketing and Promotion of Business - Issue of existence of P/E in India and Deduction of TDS - Services were being rendered outside India - No office in India - Commission is received out of sale proceeds for every completed transaction - no office establishment maintained in India - Held that amount paid on account of the commission paid to it by the applicant is not chargeable to tax in India by virtue of Art. 7 of DTAA and Section 9(1)(i) read with the Explanation thereto the applicant is not obliged to deduct the tax at source under Section 195 of the Income-tax Act 1961.
Issues Involved:
1. Tax liability of amounts paid to Zaikog Trading Co. under Section 195 of the Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, and the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) between India and South Africa. 2. Taxability of amounts paid to Zaikog in the absence of a permanent establishment in India. 3. Classification of amounts paid as fees for technical services under the Income Tax Act. 4. Requirement for Zaikog to file a return of income in India. Detailed Analysis: Issue 1: Tax Liability under Section 195 and DTAA The applicant, an Indian company, sought an advance ruling on whether the commission paid to Zaikog Trading Co., a South African company, for services rendered outside India is liable for tax deduction at source under Section 195 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The applicant argued that since Zaikog operates entirely outside India and does not have a business connection or permanent establishment in India, the income earned by Zaikog cannot be taxed in India. The ruling referenced CBDT Circular No. 23 dated 23.7.69 and Circular No. 786 dated 7.2.2000, which clarify that commission paid to non-resident agents for services rendered outside India is not taxable in India. Consequently, no tax is deductible under Section 195. Issue 2: Taxability in Absence of Permanent Establishment The DTAA between India and South Africa stipulates that business profits of an enterprise in one Contracting State shall only be taxable in that State unless the enterprise has a permanent establishment in the other State. Since Zaikog does not have a fixed place of business or any authority to conclude contracts in India, it does not have a permanent establishment in India. Therefore, the commission earned by Zaikog cannot be taxed in India. This conclusion aligns with Article 7 of the DTAA and the definition of 'permanent establishment' in Article 5. Issue 3: Classification as Fees for Technical Services The ruling addressed whether the commission paid to Zaikog could be classified as fees for technical services under the Income Tax Act. It was determined that Zaikog's services do not involve managerial, technical, or consultancy services, and thus, the amounts paid cannot be classified as fees for technical services. Therefore, Zaikog's income from the commission is not subject to tax under this provision. Issue 4: Requirement to File a Return of Income The applicant's counsel stated that this question is consequential to the answers to the first two questions. Since the commission paid to Zaikog is not taxable in India, there is no requirement for Zaikog to file a return of income in India. Conclusion: The ruling concluded that the commission paid to Zaikog Trading Co. is not taxable in India, and the applicant is not required to deduct tax at source under Section 195 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The services rendered by Zaikog do not constitute fees for technical services, and Zaikog does not need to file a return of income in India. The ruling was pronounced on the 29th day of July, 2009.
|
