Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2017 (6) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2017 (6) TMI 771 - AT - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance of exemption under Section 54 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. Interpretation of the provisions of Section 54(2) and Section 54F(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
3. Compliance with the requirement of depositing unutilized capital gains in a specified account before the due date of filing the return.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Disallowance of Exemption under Section 54 of the Income Tax Act, 1961:
The assessee sold a residential property and claimed an exemption under Section 54 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The capital gain amounting to ?59,58,733 was to be deposited or utilized before the due date of furnishing the return of income under Section 139(1). The assessee deposited the amount in installments on 01/11/2008, 14/11/2008, and 17/11/2008, totaling ?60 lakhs. However, the Assessing Officer disallowed the exemption claim.

2. Interpretation of the Provisions of Section 54(2) and Section 54F(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961:
The Tribunal considered the interpretation of Section 54(2) and Section 54F(4) of the Act. The provisions require that the capital gain amount not utilized for the purchase or construction of a new asset before the filing of the return must be deposited in a specified account before the due date under Section 139(1). The Tribunal referred to the case of Humayun Suleman Merchant vs. Chief CIT, where the Bombay High Court held that the unutilized amount must be deposited in a specified account to claim the exemption.

3. Compliance with the Requirement of Depositing Unutilized Capital Gains in a Specified Account Before the Due Date of Filing the Return:
The Tribunal analyzed whether the assessee complied with the requirement of depositing the unutilized capital gains in the specified account before the due date of filing the return. The Tribunal concluded that the assessee did not deposit the unutilized amount in the capital gain account before the due date of furnishing the return under Section 139(1). As per the Bombay High Court's decision in Humayun Suleman Merchant, the assessee is entitled to the exemption only to the extent of the amount invested in the new asset before the due date of filing the return. Since the assessee did not comply with this requirement, the exemption claim was disallowed.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the assessee, upholding the disallowance of the exemption under Section 54 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision was based on the interpretation of the provisions of Section 54(2) and Section 54F(4) and the requirement of depositing unutilized capital gains in a specified account before the due date of filing the return. The Tribunal's decision was supported by the Bombay High Court's ruling in the case of Humayun Suleman Merchant. The assessee was not entitled to the exemption for the amount deposited in the capital gain account beyond the due date of furnishing the return under Section 139(1).

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates