Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2017 (9) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2017 (9) TMI 65 - AT - Customs


Issues:
Classification of "Tail Brush FIRC" under Chapter Heading 8431 43 90 of the Customs Tariff or Chapter 9603 50 00.

Analysis:
1. The Revenue argued that the goods in question, "Tail Brush FIRC," should be classified under Chapter 9603 as brushes constituting parts of machines. They relied on specific descriptions in the Customs Tariff and Section Note 1(O) of Section XVI of HSN, which excludes brushes used as parts of machines from Chapter 84.

2. The respondent contended that the "Tail Brush FIRC" is a specific part of the Tail Shield of the Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM) and serves the purpose of shielding the flow into the TBM. They argued that the functional character of the Tail Brush is shielding, which aligns it with Chapter 8431 for parts suitable for use with machinery.

3. The Tribunal analyzed the descriptions of Chapter 9603 and Chapter 8431 along with their relevant sub-headings. It noted that Chapter 8431 covers parts suitable for use with specific machinery, while Chapter 9603 includes brushes that can be part of various machines. The Tribunal emphasized that the imported item was customized solely for use with the TBM, indicating its classification under Chapter 8431.

4. Considering the arguments presented, the Tribunal concluded that the "Tail Brush FIRC" was specifically designed for the TBM and should be classified under Chapter Heading 8431 43 90. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's classification under Chapter 9603 50 00, as the item was primarily intended for use with the TBM, falling under Chapter Heading 8430.

5. Therefore, the Tribunal upheld the classification of the "Tail Brush FIRC" under Chapter Heading 8431 43 90 and dismissed the appeal by the Revenue for lacking merit. The judgment was pronounced on 27.07.2017.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates