Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + HC Central Excise - 2018 (4) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2018 (4) TMI 958 - HC - Central Excise


Issues:
Claim for writ of Certiorari and mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for quashing impugned letters/communications and seeking adjustment or refund of tax paid inadvertently.

Analysis:
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari or a writ in the nature of Certiorari under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to quash impugned letters/communications marked as Exhibit "A1 to A2." Additionally, the petitioner requested a writ of mandamus or any other writ under Article 226 to direct Respondent No. 4 & 5 to adjust the tax already paid under the correct accounting code or refund the tax paid inadvertently, along with interest. Upon issuance of notice to the respondents, Mr. Pradeep Jetly, representing the Commissioner of Goods and Service Tax and Central Excise-respondent No.5, accepted the notice and waived service.

Subsequently, Mr. Jetly informed the Court that within one week from the date of the hearing, the necessary action would be taken to refund the amount to the petitioner. He assured that the process for the refund was already in progress. The Court acknowledged Mr. Jetly's statements as undertakings to the Court, accepting them in good faith. Consequently, the Court found that in light of the respondent's commitment to refund the amount, there was no further cause for action in the writ petition. Therefore, the Court disposed of the writ petition, considering the matter resolved based on the assurances provided by Mr. Jetly on behalf of the respondents.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates