Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2018 (5) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2018 (5) TMI 394 - AT - Central Excise


Issues:
Classification of printed computer stationery under Chapter Heading 48.20 or Chapter Heading 49.01 of CETA, 1985.

Analysis:
The appellants were manufacturing printed computer stationery without registering with the Central Excise Department, leading to a dispute on the classification of the goods. The Department contended that the goods fell under Chapter Heading 48.20, attracting duty, while the appellants argued for classification under Chapter Heading 49.01 to avoid duty charges. Two show cause notices were issued, and the Commissioner confirmed the classification under CH 48.20, demanding duty, interest, and penalties. The appellants appealed to the Tribunal, claiming their belief in the goods' classification under Chapter 49.01.

During the hearing, the appellants' counsel presented various printed stationery items, arguing that each item was specifically designed for a particular customer's use, falling under Chapter Heading 49. The appellants had sought clarification from the authorities through letters, which remained unanswered until an officer advised duty payment in 2007. The Tribunal referred to a previous case and Supreme Court decision affirming a similar issue, applying the precedent to the present case. The Tribunal distinguished a decision relied upon by the Department, emphasizing the essential nature and use of printed matter for classification.

After examining the samples of the printed documents, the Tribunal concluded that the impugned items were similar to those in the referenced case, thus classifying them under Chapter Heading 49.01. Citing relevant HSN notes, the Tribunal highlighted that if the printing on the goods conveys a message or is not merely incidental to their primary use, they fall under Chapter 49. Consequently, the demand for duty under Chapter Heading 48.20 was set aside, and the appeals were allowed in favor of the appellants.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates