9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2018 (7) TMI 454 - HC - CustomsRelease of twenty one FM gold biscuits seized - the biscuits were not released even after the order of CEGAT - Held that - Learned counsel for the petitioner is fair enough to state that a registered letter was sent to his client to find out as to whether the biscuits have been released or not but no response has been received. In view of the above, presumption goes about release of the biscuits in the intervening period of fifteen years otherwise the petitioner would have responded to the Advocate. This writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to seek revival of the petition if the biscuits have not been released or the order of the CEGAT has not been given effect to otherwise presumption goes about its implementation.
Issues:
Release of seized gold biscuits under Customs Act, 1962 after a favorable order from CEGAT. Analysis: The writ petition sought the release of twenty-one FM gold biscuits seized by the respondents in 1997 at Jodhpur. The Commissioner of Customs passed an order challenged by the petitioner before the Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (CEGAT). The matter was remanded for a hearing, resulting in an order for release of the biscuits. The Union of India appealed this decision, but CEGAT upheld the Commissioner's order, stating that the gold biscuits were not liable for confiscation under Section 111 of the Customs Act, 1962, and no penalty could be imposed. Despite the favorable order, the biscuits were not released, prompting the writ petition after more than fifteen years. The petitioner's counsel mentioned sending a registered letter to the client regarding the release status of the biscuits, but no response was received. The court presumed the release of the biscuits in the intervening fifteen years, considering the lack of response from the petitioner. Consequently, the court decided to dispose of the writ petition, granting the petitioner the liberty to revive the petition if the biscuits were not released or if CEGAT's order was not implemented. The court emphasized that the presumption was in favor of the implementation of CEGAT's order unless proven otherwise, indicating that further adjournment was unnecessary.
|
