Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + AAR GST - 2018 (7) TMI AAR This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2018 (7) TMI 884 - AAR - GST


Issues Involved:
1. Whether the activity of the applicant is covered by Entry S. No. 24 (i)(i)(c) or S. No. 24(i)(iii) of Notification No. 11/2017 Central Tax (Rate) dated 28/06/2017 attracting NIL rate of tax.
2. Whether the activity of the applicant is covered by Entry S. No. 54(c) or Entry No. 55 of Notification No. 12/2017 Central Tax (Rate) dated 28/06/2017 attracting NIL rate of tax.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Coverage under Entry S. No. 24 (i)(i)(c) or S. No. 24(i)(iii) of Notification No. 11/2017 Central Tax (Rate) dated 28/06/2017:

The applicant contends that their activity of cleaning agricultural produce such as Saunf (Fennel), Dhaniya (Coriander), and Jeera (Cumin seeds) involves removing impurities without altering the essential characteristics of the produce, thus making it marketable for the primary market. This process, they argue, falls under the category of processes usually done by a cultivator or producer, which should attract NIL rate of tax as per Entry S. No. 24(i)(i)(c) of Notification No. 11/2017 Central Tax (Rate) dated 28/06/2017.

However, the Jurisdictional Officer stated that the cleaning activity is not carried out at an agricultural farm but at a specialized cleaning plant, which disqualifies it from being classified under the said entry. The officer also noted that the mechanized cleaning does not constitute an intermediate production process as job work in relation to cultivation of plants.

The Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) found that the exemption under Entry S. No. 24(i)(i)(c) is applicable only to processes carried out at an agricultural farm. Since the applicant’s cleaning plant is located away from the farm, the activity does not qualify for NIL rate of tax under this entry.

2. Coverage under Entry S. No. 54(c) or Entry No. 55 of Notification No. 12/2017 Central Tax (Rate) dated 28/06/2017:

The applicant also argued that their cleaning activity could be considered an intermediate production process as job work in relation to agricultural produce, thus attracting NIL rate of tax under Entry S. No. 24(i)(iii) of Notification No. 11/2017 Central Tax (Rate) dated 28/06/2017 and Entry No. 55 of Notification No. 12/2017 Central Tax (Rate) dated 28/06/2017.

The AAR clarified that intermediate production processes as job work in relation to cultivation of plants typically involve agricultural operations directly related to the production of agricultural produce, such as cultivation, harvesting, threshing, plant protection, and supply of farm labor, which are carried out at the agricultural farm. Since the applicant’s mechanized cleaning process is conducted at an installed plant away from the farm, it does not qualify as an intermediate production process as job work.

Ruling:

The AAR concluded that the applicant’s activity of cleaning agricultural produce at a specialized plant does not fall under Entry S. No. 24 (i)(i)(c) or S. No. 24(i)(iii) of Notification No. 11/2017 Central Tax (Rate) dated 28/06/2017, nor under Entry S. No. 54(c) or Entry No. 55 of Notification No. 12/2017 Central Tax (Rate) dated 28/06/2017. Consequently, the activity does not attract NIL rate of tax.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates