9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Assessment of corpus proportionate to specific incomes as separate trusts. 2. Exclusion of trust fund portions related to annuities from assessments. 3. Treatment of trust fund proportionate to specific sums under Wealth-tax Act. 4. Exemption of corpus proportionate to balance income for charitable purposes under Wealth-tax Act. Issue-wise Detailed Analysis: 1. Assessment of corpus proportionate to specific incomes as separate trusts: The first issue was whether the corpus proportionate to the incomes of Rs. 50,000 and Rs. 25,000 allocated under clauses 6 and 7 of the trust deed should be assessed separately as distinct and separate trusts. This issue was covered by the decision in Trustees of Sahebzadas of Sarf-e-khas Trust v. CIT [1962] 44 ITR 332, and based on this precedent, the court answered this question against the assessee. The court also certified this case for appeal to the Supreme Court under section 29 of the Wealth-tax Act, as the decision in Trustees of Sahebzadas of Sarf-e-khas Trust was pending appeal before the Supreme Court. 2. Exclusion of trust fund portions related to annuities from assessments: The second issue concerned whether the portion of the trust fund proportionate to the aggregate amount of annuities payable to the beneficiaries under the Second and Third Schedules of the trust deed should be excluded from the assessments. This issue was analogous to question No. 1(i) in R.C. Nos. 50 and 54 of 1976, decided on February 2, 1978 [CWT v. Trustees of H. E. H. the Nizam's Miscellaneous Trust [1980] 126 ITR 233 (AP)]. The court referred to its previous reasoning in those references and applied the same to answer this question. 3. Treatment of trust fund proportionate to specific sums under Wealth-tax Act: The third issue was whether the trust fund proportionate to the sum of Rs. 75,000 allocated under clauses 6 and 7 of the trust deed should be treated as held by the trustees on behalf of the beneficiaries specified in those clauses and assessed under section 21(4) of the Wealth-tax Act. This issue was also covered by the decision in Trustees of Sahebzadas of Sarf-e-khas Trust v. CIT [1962] 44 ITR 332, and the court answered it against the assessee, similarly certifying it for appeal to the Supreme Court. 4. Exemption of corpus proportionate to balance income for charitable purposes under Wealth-tax Act: The fourth issue was whether the corpus proportionate to the balance of income falling under clause 8 of the trust deed should be treated as held for charitable purposes and exempted under section 5(1) of the Wealth-tax Act. The court examined the trust deed, particularly clause 8, which stipulated that the balance income after meeting other liabilities should be used for general charitable purposes. The court noted that the trust was created by the erstwhile Nizam of Hyderabad and was intended for public charitable purposes, including education, medical aid, and relief for the poor, without distinction of caste, creed, or religion. The court found that the absence of the words "in India" in the trust deed did not disqualify the trust from exemption, as the income was utilized for charitable purposes within India. The court distinguished this case from other cases cited by the revenue, such as CWT v. Trustees of H.E.H. The Nizam's Religious Endowment Trust [1977] 108 ITR 229, where the income was partly used outside India, and Trustees of Gordhandas Govindram Family Charity Trust v. CIT [1973] 88 ITR 47, where the trust was primarily for the benefit of the family. The court concluded that the trust property was held for public charitable purposes and upheld the Tribunal's decision granting exemption under section 5(1) of the Wealth-tax Act. The court answered the fourth question in the affirmative and in favor of the assessee, agreeing with the Tribunal's view that the property proportionate to the income under clause 8 was held for charitable purposes. The reference was answered accordingly, with no costs and an advocate's fee of Rs. 250.
|
