Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2018 (10) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2018 (10) TMI 111 - AT - Customs


Issues: Classification of imported goods, liability for anti-dumping duty, compliance with compulsory registration scheme, principles of natural justice

Classification of Imported Goods:
The case involved the import of goods declared as 'stainless steel melting scrap grade 304' but were later found to be prime goods other than scrap upon examination. The appellant argued that the goods were to be used as melting scrap despite being sheets of various sizes. The absence of a 'mill test certificate' was highlighted, and the appellant relied on the preshipment certificate for classification under heading 7204 2190 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. The tribunal noted that the customs authorities should have notified the importer of the change in classification or the importer should have accepted the revised classification. The first appellate authority's finding on classification was upheld, emphasizing the importance of certainty of tax and proper declaration by the importer.

Liability for Anti-Dumping Duty:
The re-assessment of the goods led to the imposition of anti-dumping duty under notification no. 52/2017-Cus (ADD). The tribunal observed that without a validated classification, the imposition of anti-dumping duty and the requirement to conform to Bureau of Indian Standards' prescriptions would not be sustainable. The tribunal emphasized the necessity of a comprehensive and rationale examination before changing the classification to avoid detrimental consequences for the importer.

Compliance with Compulsory Registration Scheme:
The goods were also held liable for confiscation due to failure to comply with the compulsory registration scheme and mandatory BIS certification prescribed under IS 6911 for stainless steel sheets grade 304. The appellant was permitted to redeem the goods on payment of a fine subject to re-export. The tribunal noted that the proceedings against the appellant did not comply with the principles of natural justice and the provisions of law concerning the classification of goods and valuation. As a result, the impugned order was set aside, and the original authority was directed to reconsider the matter afresh, taking all submissions of the appellant into account.

This detailed analysis of the judgment highlights the key issues of classification of imported goods, liability for anti-dumping duty, compliance with compulsory registration scheme, and adherence to principles of natural justice. The tribunal's decision focused on the importance of proper classification, notification of changes, and the necessity for a comprehensive examination before imposing duties or penalties on importers.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates