9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Classification of income from bustee properties. 2. Ownership of the property. 3. Nature of the structures. 4. Assessment of income as business income. Summary: 1. Classification of Income from Bustee Properties: The primary issue was whether the income from bustee properties should be assessed u/s 22 (income from property) or u/s 28 (income from business) or u/s 56 (income from other sources) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal held that the income should be assessed under the head "Property" based on precedents and the nature of the structures. 2. Ownership of the Property: The assessee contended that it was not the owner of the property but only a lessee. However, the court referred to a previous decision (Tinsukia Development Corpn. Ltd. v. CIT [1979] 120 ITR 476) which held that even if the ownership of the structure remained with the lessee, the income from such structures would be assessed as income from property. 3. Nature of the Structures: The assessee argued that the structures were temporary and not buildings. This contention was rejected based on the earlier reference which concluded that the structures were not seasonal and could be let out for 5 to 6 years. 4. Assessment of Income as Business Income: The assessee claimed that the income should be treated as business income, citing the Supreme Court decision in Karanpura Development Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1962] 44 ITR 362. The court noted that the Supreme Court in S. G. Mercantile Corporation P. Ltd. v. CIT [1972] 83 ITR 700 had established that income from property should be assessed under the head "Property" even if the property was part of the business activity. Conclusion: The court concluded that the income from the bustee properties should be assessed u/s 22 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The question referred was answered in the affirmative and in favor of the revenue, without prejudice to any other claims or benefits available to the assessee under the Act. There was no order as to costs.
|
