9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
- Interpretation of section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 regarding the referral of questions of law to the High Court. - Determination of whether a question of law arises out of the order of the Tribunal. - Consideration of penalty leviable under section 271(1)(c) when the assessed income is below the taxable limit for a registered firm. Analysis: The judgment pertains to an application under section 256(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, where the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal refused to state a case under section 256(1) on the basis that no question of law arose from its order dated 5th April, 1973. The Tribunal's decision was based on the principle that a question of law must be dealt with or raised before the Tribunal to be referred to the High Court. In this case, the Tribunal had only considered issues related to income concealment and penalty quantum, not the specific question of penalty leviability under section 271(1)(c) for a firm below the taxable limit. As the latter question was not raised during the appeal proceedings, the Tribunal correctly declined to refer it to the High Court. The applicant's argument that he raised several legal points in a subsequent rectification application, seeking their referral to the High Court, was deemed misconceived by the Court. It was clarified that questions of law to be referred must arise from the original Tribunal order, and the applicant had not raised the pertinent issue during the initial appeal hearing. Consequently, the Tribunal's decision to dismiss the application for lack of a relevant question of law was upheld by the Court. In conclusion, the Court dismissed the application, emphasizing that the requirement for a question of law to be referred to the High Court under section 256(1) is that it must directly stem from the Tribunal's order. The judgment underscores the importance of raising all relevant legal issues before the Tribunal during the appeal process to enable their consideration for referral to the High Court.
|
