9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Computation of the value of the deceased's share in the partnership firm. 2. Inclusion of goodwill in the estate for estate duty purposes. 3. Interpretation of the partnership deed regarding the passing of goodwill on the death of a partner. Detailed Analysis: 1. Computation of the Value of the Deceased's Share in the Partnership Firm: The Assistant Controller of Estate Duty (Asst. CED) computed the value of the deceased's share in the firm "Ashok Foundry and Metal Works" by including balances in the capital and current accounts, 20% share in provisions for liquidated damages and development reserve, and the deceased's share in the firm's goodwill. The goodwill was valued at Rs. 6 lakhs, and the deceased's 20% share therein was calculated at Rs. 1,20,000. The value was included in the estate for estate duty purposes. 2. Inclusion of Goodwill in the Estate for Estate Duty Purposes: The accountable persons appealed, contending that the business did not have any goodwill and that the value, if any, was wrongly computed. The Appellate Controller held that the business had goodwill, determined the average annual income of the firm, allowed interest at 9% per annum on the entire capital, and capitalized the super profit at three years' purchase to arrive at the market value of the goodwill. The goodwill was computed to be Rs. 2,60,400, and the deceased's 1/5th share was Rs. 52,080. Both the revenue and the accountable persons appealed to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal, referencing clause 17 of the partnership deed and a decision from the Punjab and Haryana High Court, held that no goodwill passed on the death of the deceased and thus could not be included in the estate for estate duty. Consequently, the revenue's appeal became academic, and the accountable persons' appeal was allowed. On an application by the CED, the Tribunal referred the question of law to the High Court regarding whether the Tribunal was correct in holding that no goodwill passed on the death of the deceased and thus could not be included in the estate for estate duty. 3. Interpretation of the Partnership Deed Regarding the Passing of Goodwill on the Death of a Partner: At the hearing, counsel for the revenue argued that despite clause 17 of the deed, the share of the deceased in the goodwill had to be included for estate duty purposes as it would pass either to the legal representative or the surviving partners. The revenue cited several cases, including decisions from the Supreme Court and various High Courts, to support the contention that the share of the deceased in the goodwill passes on death and should be included in the estate. Counsel for the accountable persons contended that the firm did not have any goodwill and that the computation principles were not followed. They argued that the question was abstract and should be remanded for proper determination. They also contended that under section 7 of the E.D. Act, the benefit on the death of the deceased partner accrued only to the property and not to any individual person, and there was no cesser of interest in the goodwill. The High Court concluded that the law was well-settled: the share of a deceased partner, including goodwill, passes on death and must be included in the estate for estate duty purposes. The valuation of such interest must be determined as provided under section 36 of the E.D. Act, 1953, read with rule 7(c) of the E.D. Rules. The court found that the controversy over the existence of goodwill had ended as it was not urged before the Tribunal that the firm did not have any goodwill. The court held that the Tribunal's finding that the goodwill did not pass on the death of the deceased was incorrect, but the finding that the valuation of the goodwill could not be included in the estate was correct. The entire share of the deceased, including goodwill, must be valued in accordance with the law and included in the estate for estate duty. The court noted that a miscellaneous application was pending before the Tribunal, and this judgment would not preclude the accountable persons from proceeding with that application. The judgment proceeded on the basis that the firm had goodwill, and if it was ultimately found that the firm did not have goodwill, the Tribunal would dispose of the matter in accordance with this judgment. The reference was disposed of accordingly, with no order as to costs.
|
