Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Insolvency and Bankruptcy Insolvency and Bankruptcy + Tri Insolvency and Bankruptcy - 2019 (4) TMI Tri This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2019 (4) TMI 1357 - Tri - Insolvency and Bankruptcy


Issues:
- Application under section 9 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 for Corporate Insolvency process initiation against a private limited company.
- Dispute over outstanding dues under a Brokerage Agreement.
- Failure of the Corporate Debtor to pay the operational debt leading to the initiation of insolvency proceedings.
- Appointment of Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) and implications of moratorium under Section 14(1) of the Code.

Analysis:
1. The application was filed under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, seeking to initiate the Corporate Insolvency process against the Corporate Debtor, a private limited company. The Applicant, a broker in real estate, entered into a Brokerage Agreement with the Corporate Debtor for revenue sharing, with the Corporate Debtor failing to renew the agreement after accruing an outstanding amount of ?3,60,000.

2. Despite several requests and a legal notice demanding payment, the Corporate Debtor admitted its liability but cited financial stress for non-payment. The Operational Creditor issued a demand notice under section 8 of the Code, which remained unanswered by the Corporate Debtor, leading to the filing of the present application under section 9 of the IBC, 2016.

3. The Applicant affirmed the non-receipt of the outstanding amount and any notice of dispute from the Corporate Debtor, establishing the debt of ?3,39,750 along with 18% interest. The Corporate Debtor's failure to respond or appear in the proceedings resulted in an ex-parte hearing, where the Tribunal found the application complete and admitted it.

4. The Tribunal noted that the default was not time-barred, as the debt occurred post the agreement's tenure, and the application was within the limitation period. Consequently, the Tribunal admitted the application, appointing an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) subject to certain conditions, and imposed a moratorium under Section 14(1) of the IBC, 2016, prohibiting certain actions by the Respondent during the moratorium period.

5. The order of admission was communicated to the Applicant, Corporate Debtor, and the IRP, with a copy forwarded to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India for records. The implications of the moratorium under Sections 14(2) to 14(4) of the Code were highlighted, ensuring the due process following the initiation of insolvency proceedings.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates