Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + HC Customs - 2019 (6) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2019 (6) TMI 525 - HC - Customs


Issues:
1. Petition for writ of certiorari and mandamus for clearance of imported goods.
2. Timeframe for completion of adjudication under Section 124 of the Customs Act.

Analysis:
1. The petitioner sought a writ of certiorari or any appropriate writ to challenge the withholding of action by the Department against the imported vehicle and requested a writ of mandamus to direct clearance of the goods imported under a specific Bill of Entry. The Court considered the arguments presented by both parties and ordered the respondents to complete the adjudication within four months from the date of the order. The Court emphasized that the petitioner should be given a fair hearing and a reasonable opportunity in accordance with the Customs Act.

2. The learned Standing Counsel representing the respondents argued that the suggested two-month timeframe for completing the adjudication was unrealistic, proposing a six-month period instead due to the nature of the investigation being conducted by the Department. The Court, after hearing both counsels, decided that a four-month timeframe for completing the adjudication would be appropriate. The Court's decision aimed to balance the need for expeditious resolution with ensuring a fair process for the petitioner in accordance with the provisions of the Customs Act.

In conclusion, the High Court of Kerala issued a judgment in response to a petition seeking writs of certiorari and mandamus related to the clearance of imported goods. The Court directed the completion of adjudication under Section 124 of the Customs Act within four months, ensuring that the petitioner receives a fair hearing and a reasonable opportunity during the process. This decision aimed to address the concerns raised by both parties while upholding the principles of procedural fairness and legal requirements under the Customs Act.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates