Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + HC Customs - 2019 (9) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2019 (9) TMI 969 - HC - Customs


Issues:
Claim for refund of differential duty paid on imported goods.

Analysis:
The petitioner, a private company engaged in importing goods, filed a refund application before the Customs Department claiming a refund of the differential duty paid due to a re-assessment order passed by the proper Officer under Section 17(4) of the Customs Act, 1962. The Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) had accepted the declared value of the imported fabric consignments from China. The petitioner sought a direction for the Assistant Commissioner of Customs (Refund) to decide on the refund claim within a specified timeframe. The Sr. Standing Counsel for Union of India assured the Court that the application for refund would be decided within the statutory period of three months or by a specific date. Consequently, the Court disposed of the petition as the limited prayer for a decision on the refund claim was addressed by the Revenue's commitment to decide within the stipulated time frame.

This judgment primarily deals with a claim for a refund of differential duty paid on imported goods by a private company. The petitioner's request for a direction to the Customs Department for a decision on the refund application within a specific timeframe was addressed by the assurance given by the Sr. Standing Counsel for Union of India that the application would be decided within the statutory period or by a specified date. The Court disposed of the matter based on the commitment made by the Revenue to decide on the refund claim within the stipulated time frame.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates