Home Case Index All Cases Insolvency and Bankruptcy Insolvency and Bankruptcy + Tri Insolvency and Bankruptcy - 2019 (11) TMI Tri This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2019 (11) TMI 291 - Tri - Insolvency and BankruptcyMaintainability of application - initiation of CIRP - Corporate Debtor committed default in paying the operational debt - existence of dispute or not - HELD THAT - Operational Creditor has produced all invoices to show that operational debt is due and payable by the corporate debtor. He also produced on record the demand notice under section 8 of I B Code sent to the Corporate Debtor and the track report to show that notice was duly delivered to the corporate debtor. The corporate debtor did not reply the notice within ten days of its receipt pointing out the fact that the payment of operational debt is made or there exists genuine dispute about the amount claimed. The operational creditor filed affidavit stating that he did not receive any notice or reply and the corporate debtor did not pay amount. He thereby complied with the provisions of section 9(3)(b) and 9(3)(c) of I B Code. The application requires to be admitted - Petition admitted - moratorium declared.
Issues: Application under Section 9 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 for Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process due to default in payment of operational debt.
Analysis: The Operational Creditor filed an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code against the Corporate Debtor for defaulting on payment of operational debt amounting to ?24,49,058. The Corporate Debtor was served notice but did not appear, leading to an ex parte proceeding. The Operational Creditor presented invoices, a demand notice under Section 8 of the I&B Code, and a track report confirming delivery of the notice. The Corporate Debtor failed to respond within the stipulated time, indicating no payment or genuine dispute. The Operational Creditor affirmed compliance with Section 9(3)(b) and 9(3)(c) of the I&B Code. The Tribunal found the application admissible based on the evidence presented. Consequently, the Tribunal admitted the application to initiate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process for the Corporate Debtor. A moratorium order was issued, and a public announcement was mandated as per Section 13 of the IBC, 2016. The moratorium under Section 14 of the I&B Code prohibited various actions against the Corporate Debtor, including suits, asset transfers, and recovery proceedings. Essential goods or services supply to the Corporate Debtor was protected during the moratorium period. The Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) was appointed as per the Operational Creditor's proposal. The IRP was tasked with identifying creditors, convening a Committee of Creditors, and developing a resolution plan. The Operational Creditor was directed to pay an advance fee to the IRP. The resolution plan was to be finalized within 105 days from the admission of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. The Registry was instructed to notify the order to all relevant parties. The matter was listed for a progress report filing on a specified date. The judgment outlined the detailed process and legal provisions governing the initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, emphasizing compliance with the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code and the roles of the parties involved in the resolution process.
|