Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + HC Customs - 2019 (11) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2019 (11) TMI 969 - HC - Customs


Issues:
- Interpretation of Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013 regarding educational qualifications for Customs Broker License application.

Analysis:
The judgment revolves around the interpretation of the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013 (CBLR) concerning the educational qualifications required for obtaining a Customs Broker License. The petitioner applied for the written examination for the license but received a rejection order citing the lack of proof that his foreign Master's Degree was equivalent to an MBA degree recognized by UGC/AICTE. The petitioner possessed a Bachelor's Degree in Science from the University of Madras, a Master's Degree in Science in Chemistry from Indian Institute of Technology, Madras, and a Master's Degree in Business Administration from an International University in Louisiana.

Upon analyzing Regulation 5(f)(i) and (ii) of the CBLR, it was evident that an applicant should be a graduate from a recognized University and possess a professional degree such as a Master's degree in Accounting, Finance, Management, CA/MBA/LLB, or relevant experience in Customs Broker work. The court noted that the petitioner met these requirements as he held both a Bachelor's and Master's Degree from recognized institutions, making him eligible to participate in the written examination.

The impugned order was deemed incorrect as it focused on disqualifying the petitioner based on his foreign Master's Degree while overlooking his relevant qualifications from Indian institutions. The court highlighted that the petitioner's Master's Degree in Science from Indian Institute of Technology, Madras, was a valid qualification as per the Regulations, making the rejection unwarranted. Consequently, the court set aside the rejection order and directed the publication of the petitioner's exam results. If qualified, the petitioner was to proceed to the oral interview without further scrutiny of his educational qualifications, to be completed within thirty days from the order's receipt. The writ petition was allowed without costs, and the Miscellaneous Petitions were closed.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates