Home Case Index All Cases Insolvency and Bankruptcy Insolvency and Bankruptcy + Tri Insolvency and Bankruptcy - 2020 (1) TMI Tri This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2020 (1) TMI 226 - Tri - Insolvency and BankruptcyDirections to be issued against the five banks listed in the application - Learned counsel for the RP states that they have taken all steps with respect to the extension of the validity period of bank guarantees - HELD THAT - In the facts all the aforesaid five banks are directed to not to encash the aforesaid bank guarantees till the next date of hearing. Notices be issued to the non-applicants-respondents by dasti process - List on 08.01.2020.
Issues Involved:
Application for directions against RP and United Bank of India regarding expiring bank guarantee. Directions against five banks listed in the application for extending validity of bank guarantees. Analysis: Issue 1: Application for directions against RP and United Bank of India regarding expiring bank guarantee. The present application was filed by Gail India Ltd. seeking directions against the Resolution Professional (RP) and United Bank of India concerning an expiring bank guarantee executed by the corporate debtor. The learned counsel for the applicant emphasized the urgency of the matter as the bank guarantee was set to expire on 31.12.2019. In response, the RP, represented by Mr. Ganda, assured that appropriate steps would be taken to extend the validity of the bank guarantee by three months until 31.03.2020. Consequently, the application was disposed of based on this assurance. Issue 2: Directions against five banks listed in the application for extending validity of bank guarantees. In a related matter, Mr. Ganda, representing the RP, requested directions against the five banks listed in the application to extend the validity period of the bank guarantees. The counsel for the RP confirmed that all necessary steps had been taken to ensure the extension of the expiry date of the bank guarantees mentioned in the application. As a result, all five banks were directed not to encash the bank guarantees until the next date of hearing. It was explicitly stated that the validity of the bank guarantees in question would be extended by three months. Furthermore, notices were to be issued to the non-applicants-respondents through dasti process, with the case scheduled for a hearing on 08.01.2020. This comprehensive analysis covers the key issues addressed in the legal judgment, detailing the actions taken by the parties involved and the directions provided by the Tribunal to ensure the proper extension and handling of expiring bank guarantees.
|