Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + HC GST - 2020 (3) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2020 (3) TMI 724 - HC - GST


Issues:
1. Challenge to the order passed by the City Civil Court, Hyderabad.
2. Entitlement of petitioners to rent for November 2018.
3. Liability of tenants to pay Goods and Services Tax (GST) on rents exceeding a certain amount.

Analysis:
The High Court of Telangana heard a revision filed against an order passed by the City Civil Court, Hyderabad, in a specific case. The petitioners contested the order as it omitted to mention their entitlement to rents for November 2018. The High Court noted a patent error in the lower court's order and held that the petitioners should also receive rent for November 2018 as per the provisions of Order 15A of the Civil Procedure Code.

Furthermore, the petitioners argued that the respondents, as tenants, were liable to pay Goods and Services Tax (GST) on the rents payable to them. The High Court acknowledged the settled law that tenants must pay GST when rents exceed a certain threshold annually. In this case, with a monthly rent of ?3,50,462, the total annual rent surpassed the threshold, making the tenants liable to pay GST at 18% to the Competent Authority under the GST Act, 2017.

Consequently, the High Court directed the respondents to pay the arrears of GST on the rent from November 2018 onwards within four weeks, along with the rent for November 2018. Failure to comply would result in striking off the respondents' defense. The petitioners were instructed to issue invoices to the respondents for the rents and GST due, with the amounts deposited towards rent and GST permitted to be withdrawn by the petitioners for transmission to the competent authority.

In conclusion, the Civil Revision Petition was allowed by the High Court, leading to the closure of any pending miscellaneous petitions without any order as to costs.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates