Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2007 (11) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2007 (11) TMI 198 - AT - Central Excise


Issues: Revenue appeal against deemed credit availed under Notification No. 35/2003.

Analysis:
1. Issue: Correct availing of deemed credit under Notification No. 35/2003
- The appellants, engaged in manufacturing fabrics, availed deemed credit under Notification No. 35/2003 for grey fabric in stock, triggering a show cause notice for allegedly availing excess credit under Notification No. 6/2002.
- The revenue argued that the appellants incorrectly availed credit under Notification No. 35/2003, citing Rule 9A provisions for credit availing based on duty paying documents or alternative provisions under Rule 9A(3).
- The Commissioner (Appeals) analyzed Rule 9A(3)(b)(ii) of Cenvat Credit Rules, determining credit for inputs in fabrics or garments in stock, which differs from credit for finished products. The Commissioner found that grey fabric, not a finished product, falls under a different provision (para 3(b)(iii)), allowing credit under Notification No. 35/2003.
- The Commissioner upheld the correctness of the respondent's availing of deemed credit under Notification No. 35/2003, supported by a government letter clarifying credit allowance for inputs and finished goods in stock as of 31-3-2003.

2. Judgment and Conclusion:
- The Commissioner found no infirmity in the impugned order, supporting the respondent's availing of deemed credit for grey fabric under Notification No. 35/2003, distinct from the provisions of Notification No. 6/2002 applicable to finished goods.
- The revenue did not dispute the availing of deemed credit for grey fabric, acknowledging its status as an input for manufacturing, leading to the rejection of the appeal.
- The impugned order was deemed legal, just, and maintainable, with the Commissioner upholding the correctness of the respondent's actions under Notification No. 35/2003.
- The judgment highlights the importance of proper interpretation and application of relevant rules and notifications in determining the eligibility and correctness of availed credits under the Cenvat Credit Rules, ensuring compliance with legal provisions and notifications for tax benefits.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates