Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + Tri Companies Law - 2020 (9) TMI Tri This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2020 (9) TMI 339 - Tri - Companies Law


Issues Involved:
1. Urgent hearing and disposal of the Company Petition (CP).
2. Alleged suppression of material facts and documents by the applicant.
3. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the proceedings.
4. Validity and influence of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs' communication on the Tribunal's decision-making.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Urgent Hearing and Disposal of the Company Petition (CP):
The applicant, a financial institution, sought urgent hearing and disposal of CP (IB) No. 43/7/HDB/2020 through videoconference. The Tribunal noted that the Company Petition was filed on 20.12.2019 and listed for the first time on 23.01.2020. Despite multiple listings, the Corporate Debtor had not filed a counter. The Tribunal recognized the urgency due to the significant financial impact and allowed the application, scheduling the main petition for regular hearing on 01.07.2020.

2. Alleged Suppression of Material Facts and Documents by the Applicant:
The respondent objected to the urgent hearing, alleging that the applicant suppressed crucial documents such as the Facility Agreement, Debenture Trust Deed, and Inter-Creditor Agreements. The applicant denied these allegations, stating that all relevant documents were filed and accessible to the respondent before the COVID-19 lockdown. The Tribunal found no merit in the respondent's claims of suppression and mala fide intentions.

3. Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on the Proceedings:
The respondent argued that the pandemic hindered their ability to access documents and prepare counterarguments. The Tribunal dismissed this argument, noting that the application was filed before the pandemic and lockdown. The Tribunal emphasized that near normalcy had been restored with safeguards, and the proceedings should not be delayed further.

4. Validity and Influence of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs' Communication:
The respondent contended that the Tribunal should not be influenced by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs' communication dated 24.04.2020, advising urgent hearings for cases involving significant financial defaults. The Tribunal agreed that it is an independent judicial forum but acknowledged the communication's relevance due to the substantial economic impact of large financial defaults. The Tribunal concluded that the communication could not be ignored entirely and decided to proceed with the urgent hearing.

Findings and Conclusion:
The Tribunal allowed the application for urgent hearing, recognizing the significant financial implications and the need to address the matter promptly. The main Company Petition was scheduled for regular hearing on 01.07.2020, and the application was disposed of accordingly.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates