Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + Tri Companies Law - 2020 (9) TMI Tri This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2020 (9) TMI 704 - Tri - Companies Law


Issues:
1. Objections raised by an unsecured creditor regarding a Scheme of Merger by Absorption.
2. Sanction sought under Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013 for the proposed Scheme.
3. Compliance with statutory requirements and reports filed by Official Liquidator and Regional Director.

Analysis:

Issue 1:
An unsecured creditor objected to a Scheme of Merger by Absorption, citing concerns about the transfer of liabilities affecting their rights from an arbitration award. The creditor's objections were countered by the Petitioner Companies, stating the outstanding dues and legal proceedings pending at the District and Sessions Court. The Petitioner argued that the creditor's claim was less than 5% of total outstanding dues, thus lacking locus standi under Section 230(4) of the Companies Act, 2013. It was emphasized that the Tribunal proceedings were not for recovery, and the Petitioner undertook to honor civil dispute outcomes.

Issue 2:
The Petitioner Companies sought the Tribunal's sanction for the Scheme of Merger by Absorption under Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013. The Companies had passed Board Resolutions approving the Scheme, aiming to consolidate group entities for business efficiency and synergy. The merger was deemed commercially viable, beneficial to stakeholders, and compliant with legal requirements. The Petitioners assured compliance with statutory obligations and undertook to adhere to accounting standards and other regulations.

Issue 3:
Reports from the Official Liquidator and Regional Director were submitted. The Official Liquidator confirmed proper conduct of the Transferor Company's affairs, recommending dissolution. The Regional Director's report highlighted compliance requirements, including accounting entries, appointed date, Real Estate Regulation Act applicability, and notices to concerned authorities. The Petitioner Companies responded to each observation, providing clarifications and undertakings, which were accepted by the Tribunal. The Regional Director's supplementary report deemed the Petitioner's replies satisfactory.

In conclusion, the Tribunal found the Scheme fair, reasonable, and in compliance with legal provisions. With all statutory compliances fulfilled, the Company Scheme Petition was granted, directing the filing of the Order and Scheme with relevant authorities. Regulatory bodies were instructed to act on the Order, and interested parties were given the liberty to seek further directions from the Tribunal if needed.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates