Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2021 (5) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2021 (5) TMI 488 - HC - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Legality of attachment of immovable property and bank accounts by the Income Tax Department.
2. Proportionality of the attachment concerning the outstanding tax demand.
3. Petitioner's request for lifting the attachment to pay tax under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Legality of Attachment:
The petitioner challenged the attachment of their commercial property and bank accounts by the Income Tax Department under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The Tax Recovery Officer attached the properties under section 222 read with Rule 48 of the Second Schedule to the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the bank accounts under section 226(3) of the Act. The petitioner argued that the attachment orders were excessive and disproportionate to the outstanding tax demand.

2. Proportionality of Attachment:
The petitioner contended that the total outstanding demand was ?1.08 crores, whereas the attached properties' fair market value was significantly higher. Specifically, the residential property alone was valued at ?3.71 crores, and the commercial property was valued at ?81.40 lakhs. The petitioner argued that the attachment was disproportionate, as the total value of the attached properties and bank accounts far exceeded the outstanding tax demand. The court noted that the Income Tax Department was fully secured with the attachment of the residential property and five bank accounts, which collectively had a value much higher than the outstanding demand.

3. Request for Lifting Attachment:
The petitioner sought the release of the attachment on the commercial property to sell it and use the proceeds to pay tax under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, for a company where the petitioner is a director. The court found merit in the petitioner's argument, noting that lifting the attachment on the commercial property would not prejudice the Income Tax Department, as the department was already secured by the residential property and bank accounts. The court emphasized that lifting the attachment would enable the petitioner to pay the tax under the resolution scheme, thereby achieving the scheme's purpose.

Judgment:
The court directed the Income Tax Department to lift the attachment on the commercial property situated at World Trade Centre, Office No. 407, Udhna Darwaja, Ring Road, Surat, by 30th March 2021. The court reasoned that there was sufficient security against the outstanding demand, and lifting the attachment would allow the petitioner to pay the tax under the resolution scheme. The petition was allowed, and the rule was made absolute to the extent of lifting the attachment on the commercial property. No order as to costs was made, and direct service was permitted.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates