Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + AAR GST - 2021 (9) TMI AAR This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2021 (9) TMI 568 - AAR - GST


Issues Involved:
1. Classification of the activity of composite supply of works contract service for the construction of a fish market.
2. Applicability of GST rate on the said service.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Classification of the Activity:
The applicant, M/s. Tirupati Construction, entered into a contract with the Panchayat Vibhag (Marg and Makan and Road and Building), Valsad, for the construction of a fish market building. The construction involves multiple stages such as excavation, masonry work, roofing, plastering, painting, plumbing, and more. The applicant contends that this activity qualifies as a "supply of service" under Section 7(1)(a) of the CGST Act, 2017, and is a "works contract" as defined in Section 2(119) of the CGST Act, 2017. The contract involves both goods and labor, thus fitting the definition of a works contract.

The authority examined whether the activity falls under Entry 3(vi)(a) of Notification No.11/2017-Central Tax (Rate), which pertains to composite supply of works contract provided to the government or local authority for structures predominantly meant for non-commercial use. The authority confirmed that the contract is for the construction of immovable property involving the transfer of property in goods, thereby constituting a composite supply of works contract service. The recipient of the service, Panchayat Vibhag-Road and Building, is identified as a "local authority" under Section 2(69)(a) of the CGST Act, 2017.

2. Applicability of GST Rate:
The applicant argued that the fish market is constructed under the Matsya Udhyog Yojana of the Government of Gujarat, with no profit motive, and thus should not be deemed for business or professional use. The authority examined whether the fish market falls under the category of structures predominantly meant for non-commercial use. The term "business" is broadly defined under Section 2(17) of the CGST Act, but an explanation added to Serial No.3(vi) of the Notification clarifies that "business" does not include activities undertaken by the government or local authorities as public authorities.

The applicant claimed that the fish market's purpose aligns with "Fisheries" under Entry 5 of the Eleventh Schedule to the Constitution of India. However, the authority clarified that a fish market, being a place where fish is sold, does not fall under "Fisheries" but under "Markets and Fairs" (Entry 22 of the Eleventh Schedule). The authority referred to Article 243G of the Constitution, which empowers Panchayats to manage markets and fairs, thus classifying the fish market under this entry.

Given this classification, the authority concluded that the construction of the fish market by the Valsad Panchayat, a public authority, is predominantly for non-commercial use. Therefore, the activity qualifies for the GST rate of 12% (6% CGST and 6% SGST) under Serial Number 3(vi)(a) of Notification No.11/2017-Central Tax (Rate).

Ruling:
The authority ruled that the supply of the composite works contract service for the construction of the fish market to the Valsad Panchayat is eligible for a 12% GST rate (6% CGST and 6% SGST) under Serial Number 3(vi)(a) of the said Notification.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates