Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2022 (12) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2022 (12) TMI 1220 - AT - Income Tax


Issues:
1. Interpretation of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 by CIT(A) without supporting evidence.
2. Treatment of long-term capital gain from compensation for land acquisition.
3. Addition u/s 56(2)(vii) based on difference between consideration value and stamp duty value.

Analysis:
1. The appeal by the revenue challenged the CIT(A)'s order regarding the RFCTLARR Act, 2013 without supporting evidence. The revenue contended that the Act was assumed to be applicable without any claim by the assessee. However, the Tribunal noted that the tax effect was below the revised limit of Rs. 50 lakhs for filing appeals, as per CBDT Circular No. 17/2019. The exception clause specified in Circular No. 3 of 2018 was cited by the revenue, but the Tribunal found that the appeal did not fall under the exceptions listed, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

2. The dispute involved the treatment of long-term capital gain arising from compensation for land acquisition. The AO had made an addition based on the nature of the land being deemed residential, resulting in a tax liability for the assessee. The CIT(A), however, ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that capital gains from land acquisition by the Government were not taxable. The revenue appealed this decision, but the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s order, leading to the dismissal of the revenue's appeal.

3. Another issue was the addition made u/s 56(2)(vii) based on the difference between consideration value and stamp duty value. The revenue argued that the CIT(A) erroneously deleted the addition without considering the significant difference in values. However, the Tribunal found that the revenue's appeal did not fall under the exceptions listed in the CBDT Circular, as the information was obtained from the land acquisition officer for assessment purposes. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed based on the monetary limit set by the circular.

In conclusion, the Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal on the grounds that it did not meet the exceptions specified in the CBDT Circular, and the tax effect was below the prescribed monetary limit. The decision upheld the CIT(A)'s rulings regarding the treatment of long-term capital gain from land acquisition and the addition u/s 56(2)(vii), emphasizing the importance of adhering to the circular guidelines in filing appeals.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates