Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2023 (2) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2023 (2) TMI 852 - AT - Income Tax


Issues:
Levy of penalty under section 221 of the Income Tax Act for delay in depositing tax deducted at source (TDS).

Analysis:

Issue 1: Levy of penalty under section 221 of the Income Tax Act for delay in depositing TDS

The appeals were filed by the assessee against the orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) confirming the penalty under section 221 of the Income Tax Act for the delay in depositing TDS for the Assessment Year 2017-18. The appeals were heard together as the issues were identical. The undisputed fact was that the assessee companies had delayed the deposit of TDS arrears, with delays ranging from one to twelve months for M/s. Barak Valley Cements Ltd. and two to twelve months for M/s. Meghalaya Minerals & Mines Ltd. The assessee failed to provide any plausible reasons for the delays during the proceedings under section 221 of the Act and also before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).

The Tribunal found no infirmity in the Commissioner's findings confirming the penalty under section 221 of the Act. The penalty was upheld at Rs. 70,000 for M/s. Meghalaya Minerals & Mines Ltd. and Rs. 2,70,000 for M/s. Barak Valley Cements Ltd. The grounds of appeal raised by the assessees were dismissed, and both appeals were consequently dismissed. The order was pronounced in the Court on 20th February 2023 at Guwahati.

In conclusion, the Tribunal upheld the penalties imposed under section 221 of the Income Tax Act due to the delays in depositing TDS arrears by the assessees, as they failed to provide any valid reasons for the delays. The decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was affirmed, and the appeals by the assessees were dismissed.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates