9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Import of goods without required license, fabrication of shipping documents, demurrage charges, permission to clear consignment, bonding of goods under Customs Act, adjudication of matter. Analysis: The petitioners, a small scale unit with a Textile Mill, imported Synthetic Soft Waste (Acrylic) without a required license after the goods were brought under the restricted list. The bill of lading indicated a date before the restriction, raising suspicions of fabrication. The petitioners faced demurrage and container-detention charges, seeking permission to clear the consignment or bond it in a warehouse. The third respondent suspected the fabrication of shipping documents to avoid the import ban, citing irregularities in the bill of lading dates and previous shipments cleared with false dates. Investigations revealed the goods were shipped after the restriction date, with discrepancies in the statements provided by the petitioners. The Customs Act's Section 49 allows bonding of goods if clearance cannot be immediate, but authorities can refuse permission if irregularities or confiscation suspicions exist. In this case, suspicions of fabrication and irregularities in the declaration made bonding under Section 49 untenable. The court directed the respondents to adjudicate the matter and pass orders by a specified date, dismissing the writ petition without costs. The judgment emphasizes the need for proper adjudication of import irregularities and the consequences of attempting to circumvent import restrictions through fabricated documents.
|
