Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2023 (9) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2023 (9) TMI 488 - HC - Income TaxValidity of order u/s 148A(d) - violation of principle of natural justice - AO has relied on statements and documents relating to cash, loan and transactions which were never indicated and with regard to those transactions no show cause notices were issued and there are no indications in this regard in the annexure to the notice u/s 148A(b) - HELD THAT - As respondent is not in a position to deny the aforesaid allegation that the relevant material relating to transactions, at any stage before passing the order under Section 148A(b) of the Act were supplied and furnished to the petitioner to enable the petitioner to meet the same. This writ petition is disposed of by setting aside the impugned order u/s 148A(d) and directing the petitioner to file reply/response to the aforesaid impugned order under Section 148A(d) by treating the allegations in the same as a show cause notice, within a period of four weeks from date and the assessing officer shall consider and dispose of the said reply/response to be filed within the time stipulated herein.
Issues involved: Challenge to impugned order under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for assessment year 2019-20 on grounds of violation of natural justice.
Summary: The petitioner challenged the impugned order dated 14th April, 2023, under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 2019-20, alleging a violation of the principle of natural justice. It was contended that the assessing officer relied on statements and documents related to cash, loan, and transactions without issuing show cause notices or providing relevant material to the petitioner. The respondent did not deny this allegation. The High Court, after considering the submissions and circumstances, set aside the impugned order and directed the petitioner to treat the allegations as a show cause notice. The petitioner was instructed to file a reply within four weeks, which the assessing officer would consider within eight weeks and pass a reasoned order after providing an opportunity for a hearing.
|