Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + HC Customs - 2006 (3) TMI HC This
Issues:
Prayer for issuance of a writ of mandamus for clearance of Mulberry Raw Silk consignments. Interpretation of value declared for similar goods by another importer. Disagreement on applying the same price for goods imported by different importers. Demand for duty payment at a specific value per kg. Dispute over furnishing Bank Guarantee or executing a Personal Bond for the differential duty. Analysis: The Writ Petition sought a mandamus for the clearance of Mulberry Raw Silk consignments imported by the petitioner under specific Bills of Entry. The petitioner argued that the value declared by them should be accepted based on the Tribunal's acceptance of a similar value for goods imported by another party. Reference was made to a Supreme Court decision supporting this stance. The Additional Solicitor General contended that each transaction should be evaluated independently, emphasizing that prices for goods imported by different parties cannot be equated due to various influencing factors. Despite this, the petitioner expressed readiness to pay duty on the declared value and execute a Personal Bond for the differential duty, highlighting their compliance history as a regular importer. The Department demanded duty payment based on a specific value per kg, with the Additional Solicitor General suggesting the requirement of a Bank Guarantee for the differential duty. In response, the petitioner proposed executing a Personal Bond instead, citing past duty payments and the Tribunal's acceptance of the declared value for similar goods. After considering arguments from both sides, the court directed the release of the Mulberry Raw Silk Consignments to the petitioner upon payment of duty at a specified rate per kg and the execution of a Personal Bond for the differential duty. The order included conditions for investigation/assessment cooperation, with a seven-day deadline for goods release upon compliance. Consequently, the Writ Petition was disposed of, and the connected matter was closed without costs, resolving the dispute over duty payment and clearance of the imported goods.
|