9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Confiscation of gold biscuits with foreign marking and Indian currency under the Customs Act. Analysis: The appeal in this case revolves around the question of whether gold biscuits with foreign marking and Indian currency belonging to the appellant are subject to confiscation under the Customs Act. The appellant, a resident of a specific district, claimed that the valuables were transferred to a neighbor for safety due to a legal dispute. The police seized 19 gold biscuits and Indian currency from the neighbor's house, which were later formally seized by Customs Officers. The appellant asserted that the gold biscuits were purchased from a distributor and the impugned order was based on suspicion without proper investigation. The appellant argued that the initial seizure by the police precludes invoking Section 123 of the Customs Act, citing relevant legal precedents. The appellant contended that the burden of proof lies with the Department to establish the gold as smuggled, referencing previous judgments. Regarding the Indian currency, the appellant argued that there was no evidence linking it to smuggled gold and highlighted the requirements under Section 121 of the Customs Act for confiscation of sale proceeds. The Departmental Representative countered, stating that the onus is on the appellant to prove the legality of the gold acquisition and ownership, emphasizing the lack of proper documentation and dissolution of the selling firm. The Tribunal analyzed the submissions and evidence presented by both parties. It noted that the police had seized the valuables from the neighbor's house, which were later transferred to Customs Officers. The appellant provided bills indicating the purchase of gold from a distributor, and the Department failed to prove the gold as smuggled. The Tribunal distinguished this case from previous judgments where crucial details were missing, ultimately setting aside the confiscation of the gold and Indian currency. In conclusion, the Tribunal found no evidence of the appellant's involvement in dealing with smuggled gold in the past, dismissing the notion that the Indian currency was automatically the sale proceeds of smuggled goods. The Tribunal ruled that the Department failed to prove the currency's link to smuggled gold, ultimately setting aside the confiscation of both the gold and Indian currency, and allowing the appeal.
|
