Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2005 (2) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2005 (2) TMI 298 - AT - Central Excise

Issues:
Dispute over denial of Modvat credit on specific capital goods including Head Beams for Elevators, Parts of Pollution Control Equipment, Parts of Stacker Reclaimer, Cone (Part of Coal Mill), and Structural Support for Conveyor System.

Head Beams for Elevators:
The appellant argued that Head Beams are essential for the elevator system's functioning as they form a structural component supporting the monorail necessary for elevator erection and maintenance. Citing relevant precedents, it was contended that these beams are integral to the manufacturing process and thus qualify as capital goods under Rule 57Q. The judge found merit in this argument and allowed the Modvat credit on Head Beams for Elevators.

Parts of Pollution Control Equipment:
During the relevant period, the appellant received parts of Pollution Control Equipment, which were not classified as capital goods until 23-7-96. As per the definition under Rule 57Q, these parts did not qualify for Modvat credit before the specified date. Consequently, the Commissioner's decision to deny credit on these parts was upheld.

Parts of Stacker Reclaimer:
The Stacker Reclaimer, used for material handling in the manufacturing process, was deemed integral to the production of final products. Relying on a Supreme Court decision, the judge ruled that these parts are covered under the definition of capital goods and thus eligible for Modvat credit.

Cone (Part of Coal Mill):
For the Cone received post-23-7-1996, the exclusion of Heading 84.74 from the eligibility for Modvat credit was noted. The judge concurred with the Commissioner's decision to disallow credit on this item due to the exclusion under the revised Explanation (1) to Rule 57Q.

Structural Support for Conveyor System:
The appellant contended that Structural Supports for conveyors are essential components of the conveyor system, integral to the manufacturing process. As these supports facilitate material handling, they were argued to be eligible for Modvat credit. The judge agreed, overturning the denial of credit by the Commissioner and allowing the credit on these structural supports.

In conclusion, the appellate tribunal allowed Modvat credit on Head Beams for Elevators, Parts of Stacker Reclaimer, and Structural Support for Conveyor System, while upholding the denial of credit on other items. The judgment emphasized the importance of each capital good in the manufacturing process and its alignment with the definition of capital goods under Rule 57Q.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates