1990 (7) TMI 140 - AT - Income Tax

Summary

Issues:
1. Deletion of the addition of Rs. 11,55,795
2. Deletion of addition of Rs. 50,000
3. Cross-objection against the addition of Rs. 5,000 for the alleged sale of empty containers of color chemicals

Analysis:

1. Deletion of the addition of Rs. 11,55,795:
The Revenue appealed against the deletion of the addition of Rs. 11,55,795, claiming that the assessee undercharged for job work done for its sister concern. The ITO based the addition on the presumption of normal charges for comparable quality prints. However, the CIT(A) deleted the addition citing lack of comparable cases and higher GP declared by the assessee. The tribunal agreed with the CIT(A), stating that the addition was based on conjectures, with no supporting comparable cases presented by the ITO. The tribunal found the deletion justified based on the GP declared and lack of evidence supporting the addition.

2. Deletion of addition of Rs. 50,000:
The ITO disallowed Rs. 50,000 from printing charges, alleging disproportionately high expenses in the last three months compared to the initial period. The CIT(A) upheld the assessee's explanation that the increase was due to paying outstanding bills from previous months. The tribunal affirmed the deletion, noting the increase in expenses aligned with the rise in job receipts. The tribunal found the CIT(A) decision reasonable, considering the total receipts and expenses presented before the ITO. The tribunal dismissed the Revenue's submission that the assessee failed to provide accurate information, upholding the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the addition.

3. Cross-objection against the addition of Rs. 5,000:
The assessee cross-objected to the addition of Rs. 5,000 for the alleged sale of empty containers of color chemicals. The tribunal found the addition reasonable given the total turnover and color chemical consumption. Despite the lack of a satisfactory explanation from the assessee regarding the empty containers, the tribunal upheld the addition as appropriate. The tribunal dismissed the cross-objection, finding no merit in challenging the addition.

In conclusion, both the Revenue's appeal and the assessee's cross-objection were dismissed by the tribunal, upholding the deletions and additions based on the presented evidence and explanations provided during the proceedings.