9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Granting of development rebate and depreciation on pre-operative expenditure. 2. Allowing development rebate on architectural fees. 3. Classification of cinema theatre as an "industry" for tax computation. Analysis: Issue 1: Granting of development rebate and depreciation on pre-operative expenditure The assessee, a private limited company, appealed for the assessment year 1976-77 regarding the non-granting of development rebate and depreciation on pre-operative expenditure of Rs. 17,849 incurred before the cinema theatre's air-conditioning plant and machinery were commissioned. The Commissioner (Appeals) did not thoroughly examine the capitalization of all heads of expenditure, leading to the Tribunal setting aside the findings and remanding the issue for fresh disposal. The Tribunal rejected the alternative plea for deduction under section 35D. Issue 2: Allowing development rebate on architectural fees The second contention involved the allowance of development rebate on architectural fees of Rs. 19,900. The assessee argued that the entire amount should be added to the cost of the air-conditioning plant for claiming development rebate. However, the revenue contended that only a portion of the fees related to the cost of the building and not the air-conditioning plant. The Tribunal upheld the revenue's submission, denying development rebate on the full amount based on the nature of the architectural services rendered. Issue 3: Classification of cinema theatre as an "industry" for tax computation The final contention revolved around whether the cinema theatre could be classified as an "industry" for tax computation purposes. The assessee claimed to be an "industrial company" due to its film exhibition business, arguing that it amounted to the processing of goods. However, the revenue argued that exhibiting films did not involve processing goods but merely the use of the film. The Tribunal held that the exhibition of films did not qualify as processing of goods as defined in the tax statute, emphasizing the lack of qualitative changes in the film through exhibition. The Tribunal rejected the assessee's contention, citing various legal interpretations and precedents, and upheld the lower authorities' decision. In conclusion, the Tribunal partly allowed the assessee's appeal for statistical purposes only, maintaining the rejection of development rebate and depreciation on pre-operative expenditure and architectural fees, and confirming the classification of the cinema theatre as not constituting an "industry" for tax computation.
|
