Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 1981 (2) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1981 (2) TMI 95 - AT - Income Tax

Issues:
Imposition of penalty under s. 273(1) of the IT Act, 1961 for filing a false estimate of advance tax under s. 212(1) of the IT Act, 1961.

Detailed Analysis:

1. The appeal was against the penalty imposed under s. 273(1) of the IT Act, 1961 for filing a false estimate of advance tax. The assessee, an HUF, derived income from various firms and filed an estimate of advance tax based on his share income. The notice under s. 210(1) was served, and the assessee filed an estimate on 14th Dec., 1973. The actual income for the relevant year was later found to be different from the estimate provided.

2. The return for the assessment year 1974-75 declared a net income of Rs. 36,024, while the actual income should have been Rs. 16,024. The assessment was completed at Rs. 46,684, leading to an increase in the assessee's income due to the disallowance of a deduction claimed under s. 80QQ for one of the firms.

3. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) issued a penalty notice under s. 273(a) on the grounds of filing a false estimate of advance tax. The penalty was imposed, and the assessee appealed before the AAC, arguing about the bona fide belief regarding the claimed deductions. The appeal was dismissed by the AAC.

4. The appeal before the ITAT contended that the assessee genuinely believed in the claimed deductions and, therefore, filed the estimate in good faith. The ITAT considered the assessee's state of mind at the time of filing the estimate and found that the belief was genuine. It was held that the penalty imposed was not sustainable and was deleted.

5. The ITAT concluded that the estimate filed by the assessee was based on a bona fide belief regarding the availability of deductions. As there was a reasonable cause for the assessee's actions, the penalty under s. 273(a) was deemed unjustified and was deleted. The appeal of the assessee succeeded based on the genuine belief held at the time of filing the estimate.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates