9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
- Whether the assessee, a co-operative society, is entitled to exemption under section 80P(2)(e). Analysis: The judgment involves two departmental appeals concerning the entitlement of a co-operative society to exemption under section 80P(2)(e). The co-operative society in question is an apex marketing society for agricultural produce. The main issue revolves around the interpretation of a contract between the society and the Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. The contract outlines various services the society must provide, including transportation, storage, bagging, and delivery of foodgrains. The Income-tax Officer initially denied the exemption claim, stating that the society acted as a sub-agent and did not have ownership rights over the procured paddy. However, the Appellate Asstt. Commissioner and the Tribunal found similarities with a previous case involving a co-operative society acting as an agent and receiving commission, leading them to grant the exemption. The department appealed the decision, arguing that a previous High Court decision deemed similar receipts non-exempt. The department contended that the society's income did not qualify for exemption as it did not derive from letting out godowns or warehouses. The Tribunal, however, noted differences in facts and services provided by the society, leading to a different conclusion. The Tribunal highlighted that the society's services included storage, insurance, and delivery, making it eligible for exemption under section 80P(2)(e) for income derived from letting out godowns. The judgment delves into the interpretation of the term 'letting' in the context of exemption under section 80P(2)(e). The Tribunal rejected the assessee's argument that 'letting' should be construed liberally to include various services provided, such as transportation and bagging. Citing a precedent, the Tribunal emphasized that letting should be understood broadly to encompass the use of godowns for storage, not ancillary services. Consequently, the Tribunal determined that only 50% of the receipts could be attributed to letting out godowns, entitling the society to partial exemption. In conclusion, the department's appeals were partly allowed, granting the co-operative society partial exemption under section 80P(2)(e) based on the apportionment of receipts. The judgment provides a detailed analysis of the contractual services provided by the society and the interpretation of 'letting' in the context of exemption provisions, ensuring a comprehensive examination of the legal issues involved.
|
