9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Whether the assessee can set off brought forward losses from the business of bookmaking against income from other businesses for the assessment year 1979-80. Detailed Analysis: The judgment pertains to an appeal by an individual assessee deriving income from business, specifically bookmaking with turf clubs in India. The assessee had sustained losses in the business of bookmaking in the years preceding the assessment year in question. The primary issue was whether the assessee could set off these losses against income from other businesses for the relevant assessment year. The lower authorities had disallowed the claim of set off on the grounds that the business of bookmaking was not carried on in the relevant accounting year, a prerequisite for such set off under section 72 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Appellate Tribunal considered the documents on record, including the correspondence related to the application for permission and license for bookmaking. It was noted that the assessee had temporarily suspended the business transactions in bookmaking due to financial difficulties, rather than closing the business itself. The Tribunal observed that the intention was to resume the business operations after a short period of suspension, as indicated by the correspondence and subsequent events. The Tribunal concluded that the business of bookmaking remained dormant but was not closed, and therefore, deemed to be continued. The temporary suspension of business transactions was distinguished from the discontinuance of the business itself. The Tribunal also addressed the argument that withdrawal of the application for permission/license indicated discontinuance of the business. It held that the circumstances, including the financial difficulties faced by the assessee and the recurring nature of the permission/license requirement, supported the conclusion that the business was temporarily suspended rather than discontinued. The Tribunal emphasized that the intention to resume business operations within a short period, along with subsequent events, provided sufficient evidence that the business was not permanently closed. Additionally, the Tribunal rejected an alternate ground raised by the assessee during arguments, as it required further investigation into facts and was not raised before the lower authorities. The Tribunal declined permission to consider this ground, as there was no justifiable reason for not raising it earlier. Ultimately, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Income Tax Officer to allow the set off of losses from the business of bookmaking against income from other businesses for the assessment year in question.
|
