Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 1983 (4) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1983 (4) TMI 85 - AT - Income Tax

Issues:
- Rejection of claim for deduction u/s 80J due to failure to submit audited accounts.
- Whether rejection of claim u/s 80J by CIT(A) was justified.

Analysis:
The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chandigarh was regarding the rejection of the assessee's claim for deduction under section 80J of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 1978-79. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) had disallowed the deduction as the assessee had not submitted audited accounts as required under section 80J(6A) of the Act. The CIT(A) also upheld this decision, stating that the audit report was not filed along with the return of income. The main issue was whether the rejection of the claim by the CIT(A) was justified given the circumstances.

During the proceedings, it was revealed that the assessee's counsel, who was responsible for submitting the audited accounts, was in poor health due to a heart attack and later passed away in December 1978. The Tribunal noted that the failure to furnish the audited accounts was not the fault of the assessee but due to the health condition of their representative. The Tribunal emphasized that the principles of natural justice should be considered in such cases, and the failure of the assessee should be judged accordingly. The Tribunal concluded that the audit report should have been accepted, and the claim for deduction under section 80J should be considered on its merits. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the orders of the lower authorities and directed the ITO to admit the claim of the assessee under section 80J after receiving the audit report and providing a reasonable opportunity for the assessee to be heard.

In conclusion, the Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chandigarh allowed the appeal, considering the circumstances of the case and the health condition of the assessee's representative, and directed the ITO to reconsider the claim for deduction under section 80J in accordance with the law.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates