9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Disallowance of weighted deduction under section 35B(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Analysis: The judgment pertains to an appeal regarding the disallowance of the assessee's claim of weighted deduction under section 35B(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee claimed to be a small-scale exporter and maintained that it qualified as such under the provisions of section 35B(1A). The dispute arose when the Income Tax Officer (ITO) did not accept the submission, and the learned Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the ITO's decision. The Commissioner was influenced by the lack of manufacturing activities carried out by the assessee, noting the absence of a manufacturing license, power connection, or significant machinery. The Commissioner concluded that the assessee mainly engaged in finishing goods obtained from artisans, rather than manufacturing them. In the appeal before the Appellate Tribunal, the assessee's counsel argued that the assessee indeed operated a small-scale undertaking involving manufacturing activities. The counsel referred to the trading account, fixed assets schedule showing machinery, and relied on previous tribunal decisions and High Court judgments to support the claim. On the other hand, the departmental representative cited Supreme Court decisions to counter the assessee's arguments. The Tribunal analyzed the provisions of section 35B(1A) and the definitions of "small-scale exporter" and "small-scale industrial undertaking." It noted that the assessee purchased raw material in unfinished condition and carried out various processes like soldering, polishing, and engraving in its factory. The Tribunal observed that the expenses for these activities were reflected in the financial records, and wages were paid to laborers for such work. Additionally, the fixed assets schedule mentioned relevant equipment. The Tribunal also considered precedents where similar activities were deemed to qualify for weighted deduction under section 35B(1A). Based on the facts presented and the legal interpretations, the Tribunal concluded that the assessee met the criteria to be considered a small-scale exporter eligible for weighted deduction under section 35B. The Tribunal directed the ITO to reconsider the assessee's claim in accordance with the law. Consequently, the appeal filed by the assessee was partly allowed.
|
