9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Cross-appeals against penalties under s. 272A(2)(g) of the Act for asst. yr. 1993-94. Analysis: The case involved cross-appeals by the assessee and the Revenue against penalties imposed under s. 272A(2)(g) of the Act for delayed issuance of TDS certificates. The AO held the assessee contravened the provisions due to delays, imposing a penalty of Rs. 33,16,400. The CIT(A) approved the penalty but revised the calculation, reducing it to Rs. 5,20,200. The assessee appealed against the sustained penalty, while the Revenue appealed against the reduced amount. The learned counsel argued that the penalty should not exceed the maximum TDS amount for which the certificate was issued late, citing the proviso to s. 272A(2)(g). They contended that if there was a reasonable cause for the delay, no penalty should be imposed under s. 273B of the Act. They highlighted that timely tax deduction and deposit, along with no complaints from certificate recipients, should negate penalties. Legal precedents and decisions were referenced to support the argument for a genuine delay without malicious intent. Considering the submissions, the Tribunal noted that the penalty cannot exceed the total TDS amount involved in the delayed certificates. It was observed that the delay was not intentional, as evidenced by timely tax deductions and payments, along with no complaints from certificate recipients. Legal precedents and court decisions were cited to support the conclusion that such delays do not warrant penalties under s. 272A(2)(g). Thus, the penalty sustained by the CIT(A) was deemed unjustified and canceled, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal and the allowance of the assessee's appeal. In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal and dismissed the Revenue's appeal, emphasizing that the penalty imposed for delayed TDS certificates was not justified based on the circumstances and legal provisions discussed during the proceedings.
|
