Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2006 (8) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2006 (8) TMI 246 - AT - Income Tax


Issues Involved:

1. Validity of the CIT(A) and AO's order.
2. Computation of deduction under section 80HHD.
3. Treatment of interest income from EEFC account.
4. Treatment of income from foreign exchange fluctuation.
5. Adjustment of special reserve under section 80HHD.
6. Charging of interest under sections 234B and 234C.
7. Allowance of tax credit under section 115JB.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Validity of the CIT(A) and AO's order:
The assessee contended that the order passed by the CIT(A) and the AO was "bad in law," "devoid of jurisdiction," "arbitrary," "based on conjectures and surmises," and "against the principles of natural justice." The Tribunal examined the procedural aspects and found no merit in these claims, affirming the jurisdiction and procedural propriety of the lower authorities.

2. Computation of deduction under section 80HHD:
The assessee claimed a deduction under section 80HHD at Rs. 76.77 lakhs, while the AO recomputed it at Rs. 98.39 lakhs. The AO excluded interest income from the EEFC account and profits from foreign exchange fluctuations from the business profits, leading to a lower deduction. The Tribunal directed that the business income, inclusive of interest income, should be considered for computing the deduction under section 80HHD.

3. Treatment of interest income from EEFC account:
The AO excluded Rs. 30.92 lakhs earned as interest from the EEFC account from the business profits, arguing it was not "derived" from services provided to foreign tourists. The Tribunal noted that the AO had included this interest in the gross total income and attributed it to the business activities. Consequently, the Tribunal directed that such interest income should be included in the business income for computing the deduction under section 80HHD.

4. Treatment of income from foreign exchange fluctuation:
The AO excluded Rs. 22.57 lakhs from foreign exchange fluctuations from the business income, arguing it was not "derived" from the business of tour operations. The Tribunal held that the profit or loss from foreign exchange fluctuations was part and parcel of the foreign exchange sale proceeds and should be included in the business income for the deduction under section 80HHD.

5. Adjustment of special reserve under section 80HHD:
The assessee argued for an adjustment of the special reserve from Rs. 38.38 lakhs to Rs. 29.51 lakhs, affecting future taxable income. The Tribunal did not find specific mention or detailed analysis on this point, indicating it was either resolved or not a primary focus in the appeal.

6. Charging of interest under sections 234B and 234C:
The AO charged interest under sections 234B and 234C for short payment of advance tax without considering tax credits under section 115JB. The Tribunal, referencing prior decisions, directed that interest under sections 234B and 234C should be recalculated after giving due credit for the tax paid under section 115JB.

7. Allowance of tax credit under section 115JB:
The Tribunal affirmed that tax credit under section 115JB should be considered before charging interest under sections 234B and 234C. The AO was directed to recompute the interest after accounting for the tax credit of Rs. 7,20,934 under section 115JB.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the AO to include interest income and foreign exchange fluctuation profits in the business income for computing the deduction under section 80HHD and to recalculate interest under sections 234B and 234C after considering tax credits under section 115JB.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates