1982 (7) TMI 165 - AT - Income Tax

Summary

Issues:
1. Claim of benefit under sections 80HH and 80J disallowed by ITO and confirmed by AAC.
2. Disallowance of a portion of coal purchases by ITO.
3. Disallowance of miscellaneous expenses by ITO and AAC.
4. Disallowance of machinery repairs by ITO and AAC.

Analysis:

1. The assessee claimed benefits under sections 80HH and 80J, which were initially disallowed by the ITO due to non-filing of audited accounts along with the return. The AAC upheld this decision. However, upon review, it was found that the audited accounts were filed before the assessment process, and a technical view of the law should not defeat the substantive right of the assessee to claim deductions. Citing relevant case law, the ITAT directed the ITO to allow the assessee's claims under sections 80HH and 80J.

2. The ITO disallowed a portion of the coal purchases made by the assessee, citing unverifiability of Rs. 4,000 out of the total expenditure of Rs. 42,304. The AAC supported this disallowance. Upon examination, the ITAT found the disallowance unjustified as the purchases were accepted to the extent of Rs. 38,000, questioning the rationale behind singling out Rs. 4,000 for disallowance. Consequently, the ITAT accepted the assessee's claim and deleted the disallowance.

3. A dispute arose over the disallowance of Rs. 1,000 out of miscellaneous expenses by the ITO, which was reduced to Rs. 1,000 by the AAC. The ITAT disagreed with the assessee's contention that the disallowance was unwarranted and upheld the justification provided by the authorities, confirming the disallowance of Rs. 1,000.

4. The ITO disallowed Rs. 5,000 out of machinery repairs due to an entry made on the last day of the accounting period by a third party, which was intimated to the assessee. This disallowance was affirmed by the AAC. However, the ITAT determined that the disallowance was not justified as the expenditure details were duly filed, and the influence of the last-minute entry on the decision was deemed misplaced. Consequently, the ITAT held that the disallowance was unwarranted and deleted it, allowing the appeal in part.