9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Allowance u/s 5(1)(iv) for life interest in property. 2. Interpretation of the term "belonging to" in the Wealth Tax Act. Detailed Analysis: 1. The judgment pertains to three wealth-tax appeals filed by an individual, Smt. L. Rajeswari, challenging the disallowance of allowance u/s 5(1)(iv) for her life interest in a property in Madras for the assessment years 1974-75, 1975-76, and 1976-77. The assessing authority and the first appellate authority disallowed the claim on the basis that a limited owner with a life interest cannot be equated with a full owner eligible for relief. The issue at hand is whether a life interest owner can claim the benefit under section 5(1)(iv) of the Wealth Tax Act. 2. The Tribunal referred to a previous judgment in WTA No. 125/Mad/1969-70, where it was held that a life interest ownership entitles the assessee to the benefit of relief u/s 5(1)(iv) of the Wealth Tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized that possession, enjoyment, and limited disposition rights constitute ownership in property. The interpretation of the term "belonging to" was crucial in this case. The Tribunal cited precedents to establish that the term "belonging to" does not necessarily denote absolute ownership but can signify possession of an interest less than full ownership. The legislative intent behind the introduction of sections 5(1)(iv)(a) and 5(1)(iv)(b) was analyzed to conclude that the term "belonging to" was used to encompass lesser interests like a life estate. 3. The Tribunal held that the appellant, being a life interest owner with legal rights of possession, enjoyment, and limited disposition over the property, falls within the scope of "belonging to" as per section 5(1)(iv) of the Wealth Tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized that the term "belonging to" should be construed broadly to include limited ownership interests, such as a life interest, as long as there is a right of possession and enjoyment extending to the entire property. Consequently, the appeals were allowed, and the Wealth Tax Officer was directed to compute the relief u/s 5(1)(iv) considering the appellant's entitlement to relief on the property in question.
|
