9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Allowability of retrenchment compensation as a deductible expenditure in the case of a company engaged in liquor distribution business. Analysis: The appeal pertains to the assessment year 1980-81 of an assessee company involved in liquor distribution business. The company's license for a bonded warehouse was withdrawn on 31st March 1979, leading to the suspension of its liquor distribution activity. The company continued to hire out its vans, previously used for liquor transportation, and received hire charges. The issue revolved around the allowability of retrenchment compensation paid during the relevant year as a deductible expenditure. The counsel for the assessee argued that the liquor distribution and van hiring activities formed an integrated business, and the compensation should be allowed as an expenditure. The Tribunal examined the facts, noting the unity in the control, management, and administration of both activities. It found that the two activities were interconnected and constituted one integrated business, following the tests laid down by the Supreme Court in previous cases. The Tribunal distinguished the Supreme Court's decision in CIT vs. Gemini Cashew Sales Corporation, emphasizing that in the present case, there was no complete cessation of business activity as the van hiring business continued. It relied on a Kerala High Court judgment to support its conclusion that the retrenchment compensation should be considered a legitimate business expenditure due to the ongoing business operations. Given the unity and interdependence of the liquor distribution and van hiring activities, the Tribunal reversed the CIT(A)'s order and directed the Assessing Officer to allow the retrenchment compensation paid as a deductible expenditure. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.
|
